So last time in the Vaccine v Autism court battles, the court found that mercury preservative plus MMR vaccine does not equal autism.
Just on March 12, the same court also declared that there was no proof that the children's autism was caused by the preservative alone.
So just as we thought we were getting closer to resolving this (first the retraction, then the first ruling, now this ruling...) apparently vaccine-autism believers are now saying that it's just that children are receiving so many vaccines, it causes autism.
Well. I don't know about that. If the vaccine doesn't cause autism, why would more together be evil? Likening vaccines to collateralized financial derivatives seems a bit desperate. But hey, I'm no toxicologist. So if anyone's an expert about vaccines, I'd love to know.
No comments:
Post a Comment